Mealworms, Marketing, and Sustainability: The Human Insect Connection

The marketing of insect protein, particularly mealworms, underscores the intricate relationship between entomology, technology, and society. As global populations continue to rise and concerns over the environmental impact of traditional livestock production intensify, mealworms have gained attention as a viable alternative protein source. Entomological research has been instrumental in expanding knowledge of mealworm biology, ecology, and nutritional value, enabling advancements in large-scale farming and commercialization (Huis and Oonincx 2017). Despite these developments, cultural resistance and psychological aversion to entomophagy remain significant barriers to widespread acceptance (House 2016).

Technological advancements in insect farming have greatly enhanced the efficiency and scalability of mealworm production. Automated breeding systems, precision feeding techniques, and controlled-environment rearing have improved production consistency while minimizing resource consumption, such as water and land use (Oonincx and de Boer 2012). Additionally, innovations in food processing, including defatting and protein isolation methods, have helped transform mealworms into more familiar and palatable food products, such as protein powders and meat alternatives. These technological improvements not only bolster sustainability but also address consumer hesitancy by altering the sensory attributes of insect-based foods.

Beyond the agricultural and food science sectors, the integration of mealworms into global food systems has far-reaching societal implications. The adoption of insect protein aligns with international sustainability efforts aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the environmental strain of livestock farming. Furthermore, mealworms present a potential solution for global food security, particularly in regions where traditional agriculture is vulnerable to climate change (Huis 2013). Successfully promoting insect-based protein requires interdisciplinary collaboration among entomologists, food scientists, and marketing professionals to educate consumers on the environmental and nutritional benefits of mealworms while addressing cultural biases (House 2016).

The interaction between entomology and technology extends beyond food production, influencing fields such as waste management and bioengineering. Studies have shown that mealworms possess the ability to degrade certain types of plastic waste, positioning them as a potential tool for bioremediation (Broekhoven et al. 2015). These findings illustrate how entomological research contributes to technological innovation with broader ecological applications. As insect farming technology continues to evolve, balancing scientific progress with ethical considerations and public perception will be crucial to ensuring the successful integration of mealworms into mainstream food systems.

References

Broekhoven S, Oonincx D, Huis AV, Loon AV. 2015 Jan 7. Growth performance and feed conversion efficiency of three edible mealworm species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on diets composed of organic by-products. Journal of Insect Physiology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022191015000025

House J. 2016 Jul 18. Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: academic and commercial implications. Appetite. [accessed 2025 Feb 2]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666316302902.

Huis A van. 2013 Jan 7. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology. [accessed 2025 Feb 2]. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704.

Huis A van, Oonincx DGAB. 2017 Sep 15. The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. SpringerLink. [accessed 2025 Feb 2]. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8.

Oonincx DGAB, Boer IJM de. Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans – a life cycle assessment. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051145